Presidential Influence on the Bureaucracy: The Curious Case of Lina Khan

By Nickolas Remish

Faculty Mentor: Jared McDonald

Abstract

How effective can a president be in promoting his or her policies through the bureaucracy? Most theories postulate the president has influence – via appointees, budgeting, and executive orders. This paper unpacks the president’s influence on the bureaucracy by analyzing President Biden’s effect on antitrust, particularly with regards to addressing labor concerns. Biden appears to depart from previous presidential administrations due to his heightened emphasis on labor’s need for protection and antitrust law as the optimal vehicle for helping workers. The data, pulled from federal and state court antitrust cases since 2000, relies on textual analysis with regards to the frequency of labor terminology. President Biden’s dedication towards deconcentrating the labor market appears to increase labor considerations in antitrust suits, as the data demonstrate a rise in terms related to labor during the Biden Administration. Labor terminology was increasing throughout the past two decades but experienced a bump in its rate of increase during President Biden’s first term. Hence, the president’s effects on antitrust and the bureaucracy appear persuasive based on the considered evidence. These findings indicate the bureaucracy is swayed by political headwinds, making consistent regulation difficult.


by

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

css.php